ATRPMS NVIDIA DRIVER
| Uploader: | Tojamuro |
| Date Added: | 3 February 2007 |
| File Size: | 26.13 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 20862 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
So, I need X. The card is nothing weird, it's a GeForce FX with a tv out. Cannot say that for atrpms packages. I'll try the atrp,s module again and fiddle with modprobe, etc.
atrpms Nvidia drivers? Yum kernel conflict??? A better repository? - CentOS
I'm trying to figure out why the priority scheme doesn't work, since it really should not allow my kernel to be overwritten. The thing is I'll vnidia have to recompile other modules after every kernel upgrade. Under Fc4 I had a working xorg. Regarding nvidia drivers, there is the very nice rpmforge dkms-based nvidia-xdrv, which is sometimes not the latest release of the nvidia drivers.
RPM resource nvidia-graphicslibs
As you can see, it checks to see if the driver is already installed and, if not, runs the script. The box is also pretty standard. Either way, you are installing the same closed source driver. I was going to try rpmforge next. I guess windows black box strategies even work under linux!
Thanks in advance, Joaquin. I hadn't tried this before because for some reason I thought nvidia had given up direct support for linux kernels and the drivers being used were 3rd party.
Not only did the atrpms pkg try to replace my kernel, but the install also failed after it conflicted with my ahrpms kernel. I use it on several systems, but did have some trouble atrlms it on a nvida FX card similar to yours. The way I see it, the document is obsolete.
RPM resource nvidia-graphics295.20-libs
What worked was to simply go to nvidia and download their driver, run it, compile a module for my kernel and install it. It nvvidia set to take all default answers, so make sure you can successflly run the xxx. On the other hand, I still don't know where to get nvidia, ivtv, etc.

nvidiw Ugh, why is this still such an issue, the drivers are public!!! I ran redhat since 5. I've had trouble with them in the past.

I'd say I'm just not familiar with the hvidia people use reliably under CentOS. My experience with atrpms is that when you upgrade your base operating system formerly fedora in my casethe fcx. One thing that sucks about this strategy is that for every kernel upgrade I'll need to recompile the darn module. Board index All times are UTC. General support questions including new installations. Now, if you have installed it by running the nvidia's xxx.

Nothing seems to have atrpmss according to my problem above. Now to install Fluxbox and the rest of my stuff At some point, the nvidia driver won't support the kernel and I'll be SOL.

Comments
Post a Comment